Page Summary
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
yertelsbitch.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiveminutebreak.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cunan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
busychild424.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cunan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cunan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
busychild424.livejournal.com - (no subject)
galador42.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
busychild424.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
busychild424.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
busychild424.livejournal.com - (no subject)
galador42.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiveminutebreak.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
the-rare-one.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiveminutebreak.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wallflower79.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mutedtelevision.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roaming.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ouij.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ouij.livejournal.com - (no subject)
misterx.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Voyage en Orient for Funky Circles by
- Resources: Wagom
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags






no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:15 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:29 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:37 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:38 am (UTC)This is what I say to anyone whose photos are this much better than mine.
Okay, so the thingy in the foreground looks like one of those things you massage someone's back with, and I see a flashlight and some weird Spencer's fiber-optic toy. But is that what the blue-white *whoosh* in #4 is?
Jealous, man. This sh!t is awesome.
no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:51 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:54 am (UTC)Mine is not mine because I have yet to find two thousand dollars laying around my house. (If one is going to order the camera why not supplement one's lens collection at the same time, I am in need of something either macro, stalkerish, or super wide angle.)
no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:54 am (UTC)To answer your question...
It's the fiber optic thingie (not spencers though, too expensive. I paid $1.00 at the flea market) being pulled through the "legs" of the aforementioned massager in a 10 second exposure.
no subject
on 2004-06-11 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 10:04 am (UTC)I am in the same boat as you though. *sadness*
no subject
on 2004-06-11 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 11:44 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 11:51 am (UTC)Oh. Uh, sorry about that.
no subject
on 2004-06-11 11:54 am (UTC)And you have found yet another area in which I am remiss. I need to be quicker about moving new shots onto the website. Remember those waterfall pics from a few weeks ago? Still not posted.
The shame...
no subject
on 2004-06-11 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 12:28 pm (UTC)And duh, I think I should be able to remember that website next time. How's it been going, anyway? Have you been selling any prints?
no subject
on 2004-06-11 12:34 pm (UTC)which reminds me, I have to see if my search engine work has done any good.
no subject
on 2004-06-11 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-11 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-12 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-12 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-12 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-12 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-14 09:13 am (UTC)The exception seems to have been the T-series manual focus SLRs, where the flagship was the T90.
no subject
on 2004-06-14 09:14 am (UTC)no subject
on 2004-06-14 09:40 am (UTC)