misterx: (Default)
[personal profile] misterx
Am I posting too many photos? Would you rather they were behind a cut tag? Someone suggested they should be, but I figured I'd ask everyone.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

on 2005-11-09 04:46 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] mountain-lion.livejournal.com
first, no such thing as too many photos. especially yours. secondly, i like how you do it. one photo uncut the rest cut.

on 2005-11-09 04:47 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] cuddlebug910.livejournal.com
I'm of the opinion that there's no such thing as "too many" but that's just me. :D Cuts are good for people who are picky about their friends page, but it's just an extra step to the eyecandy for me.

on 2005-11-09 04:47 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ilea.livejournal.com
I don't care really. I find your photos pleasing and they don't slow me down (but then I have dsl). It might be good to cut tag them for dial up users though.

Some people are insane for cuttags too.


Do what you want! don't give in to da man!

on 2005-11-09 04:50 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] starsail.livejournal.com
I'm with the majority. Don't need cut-tags, however you want to do it's ok with me. Just love looking at those photos! :)

on 2005-11-09 04:50 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] cyan-blue.livejournal.com
I like your photos!

I think the first in a set should be un-cut, the rest should be cut-tagged, as you've been doing.

on 2005-11-09 04:56 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
yeah, but I kind of changed that on this batch. I put more out front that I could have grouped.

on 2005-11-09 04:58 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
I left more of these latest I have posted ungrouped. I could have grouped the three wedding shots, but I thought they were better not in context.

I mainly just want to check that I'm not pissing anybody off. :)

on 2005-11-09 04:58 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
ok, cool.

on 2005-11-09 04:58 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
vive la resistance!

or something.

on 2005-11-09 04:59 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] mountain-lion.livejournal.com
well, okay, but it wasn't too much or anything.

on 2005-11-09 04:59 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
Ok. If it gets to feeling "spammy", let me know.

on 2005-11-09 04:59 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
kewl

on 2005-11-09 05:00 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] tlc71076.livejournal.com
Your photos are what get me one step closer to coming to visit. Keep 'em comin' please! :)

on 2005-11-09 05:02 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
cool by me.

on 2005-11-09 05:20 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] alby.livejournal.com
I like to see the pictures without the cut... I guess I am too lazy to click on the tag ;-)

And no, not too many photos.

on 2005-11-09 05:23 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] evilbeth.livejournal.com
Ditto most everyone else. I don't care for cut-tags and I absolutely love your photos.

on 2005-11-09 05:26 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] xbrokenx.livejournal.com
its your journal..
post what you want!!!!!!!
:D
i love em!
cut or no cut.

on 2005-11-09 05:27 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
ok... no snippage unless needed.

on 2005-11-09 05:28 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] simplykimberly.livejournal.com
I likes 'em as is! I personally find when someone posts pictures a bit spaced out, time-wise, I seem to ... absorb them more, I guess - but that's probably just me :) I love the pics however you post them!

on 2005-11-09 05:29 pm (UTC)
Posted by (Anonymous)
Don't cut unless it's not work safe ;)

And there's no such thing as too many photos!

on 2005-11-09 05:37 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
interesting thing you noticed there. If you post one pic, you find out what people think of it. If you post more than one, the universal reaction seems to be for people to pick which is "the best", and the rest don't get any consideration. If you post a subtle pic along with a flashy one, the subtle one may be the better pic, but it doesn't get noticed.

on 2005-11-09 05:37 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
I'm usually pretty work safe. :)

on 2005-11-09 05:40 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
I figured you would say that. :)

on 2005-11-09 06:00 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rhapsody-98.livejournal.com
SECONDED!!

on 2005-11-09 06:07 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] mountain-lion.livejournal.com
he's the best, isn't he?
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 24th, 2026 09:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios