Photo question

[misterx]

Am I posting too many photos? Would you rather they were behind a cut tag? Someone suggested they should be, but I figured I'd ask everyone.

Comments

[mountain-lion.livejournal.com]

first, no such thing as too many photos. especially yours. secondly, i like how you do it. one photo uncut the rest cut.

[misterx.livejournal.com]

yeah, but I kind of changed that on this batch. I put more out front that I could have grouped.

[rhapsody-98.livejournal.com]

SECONDED!!

[cuddlebug910.livejournal.com]

I'm of the opinion that there's no such thing as "too many" but that's just me. :D Cuts are good for people who are picky about their friends page, but it's just an extra step to the eyecandy for me.

[misterx.livejournal.com]

Ok. If it gets to feeling "spammy", let me know.

[ilea.livejournal.com]

I don't care really. I find your photos pleasing and they don't slow me down (but then I have dsl). It might be good to cut tag them for dial up users though.

Some people are insane for cuttags too.


Do what you want! don't give in to da man!

[misterx.livejournal.com]

vive la resistance!

or something.

[starsail.livejournal.com]

I'm with the majority. Don't need cut-tags, however you want to do it's ok with me. Just love looking at those photos! :)

[misterx.livejournal.com]

ok, cool.

[cyan-blue.livejournal.com]

I like your photos!

I think the first in a set should be un-cut, the rest should be cut-tagged, as you've been doing.

[misterx.livejournal.com]

I left more of these latest I have posted ungrouped. I could have grouped the three wedding shots, but I thought they were better not in context.

I mainly just want to check that I'm not pissing anybody off. :)

[tlc71076.livejournal.com]

Your photos are what get me one step closer to coming to visit. Keep 'em comin' please! :)

[misterx.livejournal.com]

cool by me.

[alby.livejournal.com]

I like to see the pictures without the cut... I guess I am too lazy to click on the tag ;-)

And no, not too many photos.

[evilbeth.livejournal.com]

Ditto most everyone else. I don't care for cut-tags and I absolutely love your photos.

[misterx.livejournal.com]

ok... no snippage unless needed.

[xbrokenx.livejournal.com]

its your journal..
post what you want!!!!!!!
:D
i love em!
cut or no cut.

[simplykimberly.livejournal.com]

I likes 'em as is! I personally find when someone posts pictures a bit spaced out, time-wise, I seem to ... absorb them more, I guess - but that's probably just me :) I love the pics however you post them!

[misterx.livejournal.com]

interesting thing you noticed there. If you post one pic, you find out what people think of it. If you post more than one, the universal reaction seems to be for people to pick which is "the best", and the rest don't get any consideration. If you post a subtle pic along with a flashy one, the subtle one may be the better pic, but it doesn't get noticed.

[(Anonymous)]

Don't cut unless it's not work safe ;)

And there's no such thing as too many photos!

[misterx.livejournal.com]

I'm usually pretty work safe. :)

[misterx.livejournal.com]

I figured you would say that. :)

[wolfsilveroak.livejournal.com]

My thinking is that its YOUR Journal.
For me, they aren't huge, they are an excellant size and being on cable, they don't take forever to load. Besides, uousually there's only one that's not behind a cut.
Other people don't put all their pictures behind cuts(I do when they are huge, but small ones like this I won't), so why should you have to?

[prizmdonna.livejournal.com]

Your photos are awesome, and you generally do cut tag when there's more than one. And the times you've done otherwise haven't been overbearing at all. I think you've been handling it perfectly.

- donna

[chelchik.livejournal.com]

No, you're doing it perfectly.

[blues-dream.livejournal.com]

No! I hate cuts. I like having pictures on my friends list, especially yours! Heck, I co-mod a photo community where one of the rules is no LJ-cuts!

Something fun to try when you name your pictures: give it a name that has absolutely nothing to do with the picture, just to confuse people. I like long, melodramatic ones, myself.

[misterx.livejournal.com]

"Several Species Of Small Furry Animals Gathered Together In A Cave And Grooving With a Pict"

[chiefted]

No you're not posting too many photos at all. I am using one
as a desktop photo right now.

I like that you post a thumb nail of sorts too.

More more more.....please

[theweary.livejournal.com]

your photos rock.. no cuts.. unless you post 200 at once, then a cut might be good.
You're my favorite photographer, so why'd I want to have them all hidden? I see no logic in that.

from the overall tally here you're not pissing anyone off and if you are they must not care to tell ya, so post away!

[misterx.livejournal.com]

dammit, i was going to post 200 at once. now I have to get a new plan.

[galador42.livejournal.com]

I say, Bring 'Em On!

[natf.livejournal.com]

Am I posting too many photos?

No.

Would you rather they were behind a cut tag?

No.

That person should turn on the setting in their LJ that makes images into little icons if they have a problem with it, or just scroll past.

[misterx.livejournal.com]

good thing you don't think it's too many, I'm on a roll tonight. :)

[yuriination.livejournal.com]

1. you can never post too many pics. You and cuntishness are really the only reasons I come to check LJ. Keep em commin' :)
2. It doesnt matter how you post them..as long as you post them. :)
3. I'd like to put in a request for some 'not work safe' pics as mentioned by someone else. ;) the human landscape is beautiful too.

[misterx.livejournal.com]

1. good thing, because I've been a pic-o-maniac
2. check
3. i'd need a model... i don't know anyone i could approach about such an idea.