on 2006-06-21 11:38 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] tn-grrl.livejournal.com
ahhhh. Now this one, I'd like to live in, at least for a quiet while...

on 2006-06-22 03:20 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
unfortunately it's not that quiet... too close to the road.

on 2006-06-22 01:34 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] john1082.livejournal.com
An old fruit or vegetable stand perhaps?

on 2006-06-22 03:20 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
I suspect so. Or maybe t-shirts and rebel flags. Or homemade preserves and honey.

on 2006-06-22 02:19 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] cuntishness.livejournal.com
wow. i'd love to see that as a print.

on 2006-06-22 03:21 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
which, the first or second?

on 2006-06-24 06:32 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] cuntishness.livejournal.com
sorry the second. the lighting and high silver tones make me think it would be just stunning.

on 2006-06-22 02:38 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] brotherskeeper1.livejournal.com
I like the first photo the best. Just an old one room shack with a tin roof it appears. Not even the eaves are enclosed. What a state of disrepair!
Great b&w shot!

Thanks for sharing these.

on 2006-06-22 03:22 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
What a state of disrepair!

and here I was thinking it looked pretty good compared to some of them. ;)

on 2006-06-22 04:17 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] subtlesabotage.livejournal.com
I'd like to crawl under those trees and read a good book.

on 2006-06-22 03:22 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
they would let you.

on 2006-06-22 10:05 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] patty-puke.livejournal.com
i like how luminous the first one looks. if you don't mind me asking - what kind of camera do you use (and film if it's not a digital)? is it photoshopped at all?

on 2006-06-22 10:11 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] misterx.livejournal.com
it's a canon 20d (digital).

I never know what to say to "is it photoshopped?". Everything gets run through a graphic program to adjust levels, saturation, contrast, etc. For instance, this was shot in 12 bit color, converted to black and white on the computer, then a subtle sepia tone applied. That's the equivalent of darkroom processing to me though... things you do to the entire image. Never mind which, I shoot RAW format... raw sensor data, not jpeg or tiff. It isn't an "image" while it's in the camera. It isn't turned into an image until after it goes through the software on my PC.

The only *selective* editing I did was to darken the corners a bit, particularly in the foreground.

on 2006-06-23 02:24 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] jintenn76.livejournal.com
These are really neat!!!

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 23rd, 2026 10:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios