![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From an email I just received from Kodak Gallery (formerly Ofoto):
If their prints are equivalent to CVS's, I'm not their target customer. It's a pity... they used to have high standards back in the Ofoto days. I worried this would happen.
If their prints are equivalent to CVS's, I'm not their target customer. It's a pity... they used to have high standards back in the Ofoto days. I worried this would happen.
no subject
on 2006-03-11 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-11 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-11 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-11 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-12 09:43 am (UTC)i use deviantart.com, they're prints have been fantastic, shipping fast, though the large prints are shipped rolled.
no subject
on 2006-03-12 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-11 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-11 09:15 pm (UTC)Kodak Kodak bash bash bash
no subject
on 2006-03-11 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-11 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-03-11 09:37 pm (UTC)http://papayas.livejournal.com/163385.html
someone recommended mpix to me, as well.
no subject
on 2006-03-11 09:58 pm (UTC)my only beef with mpix is that they only keep images online so long. you can't keep them on indefinitely like you can with kodakgallery.
no subject
on 2006-03-11 10:18 pm (UTC)adorama has also been good to me, except for that weird customer service mix-up.